Tax Credits & Incentives: Understanding Their Importance

teslaTax credits and incentives are back in the news.  California automaker Tesla is in talks with five states to build a new, ten-million-square-foot factory.  The battery plant will cost $5 billion to construct and will create an estimated 6,500 jobs.  It's easy to see why so many states are playing the role of suitor.  In this post we'll take a look at the power of tax credits and incentives plus we'll examine California's chances of landing the new Tesla contract.

 

The Power of Tax Credits and Incentives

Tesla is a good case study to understand the significance of tax credits and incentives.  The five states in the running (California, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas) are all offering something to attract the car maker.  The exact details are closely guarded but these types of deals typically involve breaks on everything from tax credits based on the number of employees hired to income tax or sales tax credits for purchases of equipment, and property tax reductions or abatements.  Oftentimes the negotiated incentives also include promised assistance with infrastructure.Read more


Focus on Nevada

Miles Consulting continues to help clients in other states, so this week we dedicate some time to Nevada.

Business Climate:

Nevada conjures up images of bright lights, gambling, and other entertainment. But we’re blogging about state taxes! According to the 2014 State Business Tax Climate Index, Nevada ranks very favorably due to an absence of several taxes. Some of the taxes not levied include individual income tax, franchise tax, and corporate tax. Nevada also offers many credit and incentives programs that attract employers to increase their workforce. The combination of low taxes and incentives makes Nevada a hot spot for new and existing businesses. Companies like Amazon and Urban Outfitters elected to create fulfillment centers in the Northern Nevada area for these very reasons. The geographic location of Nevada is still within close proximity to California markets without the burden of a high tax structure.

Key industries within the state include manufacturing, aerospace/defense, mining, tourism, gaming, and hospitality. As of 2014, there are roughly 381,800 jobs within the tourism & gaming industry. Nevada is an ideal location for manufacturing due to its proximity to ports in California. The industry currently has over 1,800 manufacturing companies which employ over 56,000 residents of Nevada. The state-wide unemployment rate in April 2014 was 8.0% and has been decreasing due to the addition of 42,700 private sector jobs added within the first four months of 2014.Read more


Sales Tax Issue Heads to the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court will decide on Colorado's "Amazon Tax" this fall
The Supreme Court will decide on Colorado's "Amazon Tax" this fall

This fall the United States Supreme Court will add its opinion to the online sales tax debate.  The court has agreed to hear a case challenging Colorado's "Amazon Tax."  The 2010 law requires online retailers located outside the state to notify consumers of the state sales tax they would owe on purchases.  Not only that, the law required these companies to turn over customer names to the state so that the state could enforce the remittance of self-assessed use tax.  The Direction Marketing Association [DMA] challenged the law on the basis it violated a consumer's right to privacy.

The "Amazon Tax"

One of the more interesting aspects of this legislation concerns how sales tax is collected. The Colorado law doesn't ask out-of-state companies to collect sales tax, but it does require them to report the names, address and total annual purchases.  This is a pretty clever way (read “Big Brother”) of charging an online sales tax – albeit in a roundabout way.  A federal district court sided with DMA on the grounds that the notice and reporting aspects of the law violated the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.  The 10th Circuit Court of appeals later overturned this decision.Read more


CA Manufacturing Exemption - Regs Final

The California Manufacturers’ Sales/Use Tax Exemption allows certain manufacturing and biotech companies (within NAICS codes 3111 to 3399, 541711, or 541712) to claim a partial exemption from sales and use tax on purchases of manufacturing and research and development (R&D) equipment. The partial exemption rate is 4.1875%.

Regulation Finalized

On July 17, 2014 the California State Board of Equalization (BOE) adopted a regulation to implement the California Manufacturers’ Sales/Use Tax Exemption. The law and related regulation applies to equipment used primarily (greater than 50% of the time) in manufacturing or research and development. This regulation further clarified the Board’s view of the types of businesses and purchases that qualify for the exemption which took effect on July 1, 2014.

The Regulation discusses specific areas that might be of interest to our clients, including:

  • Qualifications of an “establishment” within a business that might not be in a primarily qualified NAICS code.
  • Definition of “qualified property” including special purpose buildings.
  • Special rules for construction contractors.

Read more


Soda and Sin Tax

Soda is on the ballot this fall.  Berkeley residents will get a chance to vote on a proposed 1-cent-per-ounce tax on sugary drinks in November. The "soda tax" is essentially an excise tax designed to limit consumption.  The big question is: do they work?  In this post we'll take a look at the rationale behind this type of excise tax and whether or not they're effective.

Voters in Berkeley will soon vote on a soda tax
Voters in Berkeley will soon vote on a soda tax

Sin Tax

This form of excise tax has a more diabolical name – “sin tax.”  As the moniker implies, a sin tax is placed on something deemed socially offensive.  Cigarettes, alcohol and gambling fall into this category.  Soda made it on the list because of the current obesity epidemic plaguing the United States.  The traditional belief held that the more expensive a product or service, the less likely it would be purchased.  The current thinking focuses more on the impact felt by others.  A good example is taxing cigarettes because of the risks associated with second hand smoke.Read more


Update on CA Competes Tax Credit

Background

As previously discussed in this blog the California Competes Tax Credit is a new income tax credit for which companies submit applications to the state detailing increased investment in California. The submissions are vetted by a five member panel. On June 19th, a committee meeting of the Go-Biz board (representing the Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development) was held in Sacramento to approve and announce those companies receiving their share of the first $30 million in tax credit available for the fiscal year ending June 30th, 2014.  A total of 31 companies will receive a share of the $30 Million, out of almost 400 companies, who requested approximately $500M in credits.  Thus, the "winners" were truly an elite group.

The new fiscal year for this credit began July 1st and the total amount of credit allocated has jumped up to $150 million!  No more than twenty percent of the credit may go to any one applicant per fiscal year. Again, twenty-five percent of the $150 million will be reserved for small business. There are multiple phases of the application evaluation which is performed by a set group of Go-Biz administrators.

The first phase is based on a formula where the amount of tax credit requested by the applicant is compared to the applicant’s proposed new full-time employee compensation and capital investment commitments. Applicants who sent letters certifying they were at risk of reducing the number of employees in California absent the credit were automatically moved to the second phase of evaluation. The remaining applicants were ordered from lowest to highest based off the compensation versus employee compensation plus capital investment ratio. Ratios within the top 200% were then moved to the second phase of evaluations as well.Read more


Goods, Services and the Cloud

The cloud confuses traditional rules surrounding property
The cloud confuses traditional rules surrounding property

On its surface, the cloud is a relatively simple idea…except where sales taxes are concerned.  Individuals and businesses use the cloud to access programs or store data via the Internet.  There is usually no tangible property or service you can physically hold, nor can these materials be downloaded.  However, you can often use them as you would previously have used the tangible version (i.e. digital music vs. a CD or software off the shelf vs. software as a service (“SaaS”) and that's where this issue gets complicated.  The cloud challenges standard definitions of property and raises serious questions about taxation, both for sales tax and income tax.

Good or Service?

Say you purchase the use of “software” from a cloud provider for use in your business.  Does it count as a tangible good even though the traditional rules don't apply?  A key component of personal property is whether or not the item can be touched or otherwise “perceived by the senses.”  For instance, a house is real estate, a car is personal property.  These are important distinctions because classification determines what kinds of taxes apply.  The water only gets muddier when you consider how the software is accessed.  Chances are your business uses some form of cloud hosting service.  Does this make the good a service?  This is an argument that will need to be addressed as more and companies move toward cloud commerce. Read more


Focus on Oregon - Taxes and Tax Credits

 

 

104

 

Miles Consulting continues to help clients in many states, so this week we dedicate some blog time to Oregon. (Photo credit  - M. Miles at Mulnomah Falls, OR.)

Business Climate:

Oregon is one of the few states without sales or use tax.  However, they make up for it by being the third highest in the nation for personal income taxes.  Yet, Oregon  ranks 12 out of 50 states with the most favorable tax climate.  The unemployment rate in Oregon was 6.9 percent in March compared to the national rate at 6.7 percent.  Major Oregon industries include advanced manufacturing, clean technology, forestry/wood products, high technology, outdoor gear and activewear. (Oregon is home to Nike, Columbia Sportswear, and Adidas)

Oregon has one of the most aggressive renewable energy policies in the nation.  The state’s standard requires that electric utilities must meet at least 25% of their Oregon load with renewable energy by the year 2025.  Virtually all of Oregon’s electric load growth must come from new renewable energy.  The standard also provides a goal that at least 1/3 of these targets be met by resources smaller than 25 megawatts in size. Solar energy counts double towards meeting the targets.

Taxes:

Oregon is one of just five states without a sales or use tax. (The other states are Alaska, Montana, New Hampshire, and Delaware.)  Personal income tax rates in Oregon range from 5 percent to 9.9 percent.    In comparison, New York ranges from 1 to 8.82 percent and; California ranges 1 to 13.3 percent.  Oregon collects a corporate income/excise tax of 6.600 to 7.600 percent based on gross taxable income.Read more


Internet Tax Freedom Act: Why it's Important

An interesting debate is playing out in our nation's capital.  The House of Representatives recently passed an extension of the Internet Tax Freedom Act.  The legislation prohibits federal, state or local governments from taxing Internet access.  Congress first passed the Internet Tax Freedom Act in 1998.  Renewing or perhaps permanently banning taxes on Internet access is a smart idea. Well, things aren't as easy as they seem and to understand why we'll have to revisit the currently stalled Marketplace Fairness Act.

The Marketplace Fairness Act

As you may remember from our previous blog posts, the Marketplace Fairness Act would require most online vendors to collect sales tax.  Currently, a company only has to charge sales tax if they have nexus in a particular state.  The act would theoretically level the playing field between online retailers and traditional brick and mortar operations.  Proponents also like the bill because it would bring more money into local coffers.  But many of us, Miles Consulting Group included, think it’s not that simple, and that the Marketplace Fairness Act as proposed may create more problems than it solves.

A Tale of Two Acts

Here's where things get tricky.  The Marketplace Fairness Act faces an uphill battle in the Republican controlled House, which is part of the reason it's currently stalled.  The Internet Tax Freedom Act is now in the Senate and many believe it will be used as a bargaining chip.  This is an election year and no incumbent wants to be seen letting a tax exemption expire that benefits his or her constituents.  A tax on Internet connections would no doubt be passed along to consumers in the form of higher prices.

On the other hand, the Marketplace Fairness Act extends the realm of sales tax - you can probably see where this is going.  Tax, of course, , is a dirty word in politics.  This kind of narrow thinking will only impede progress and ensure nothing gets done.  Most people would agree that our tax code is in need of reform.  The Internet Tax Freedom Act and the Marketplace Freedom Act are useful pieces of legislation that should be considered individually.

In my opinion, the Senate should not hold the Internet Tax Freedom Act hostage while the House continues to mull over the Marketplace Fairness Act. The former is more of a “slam dunk” while the latter requires more discussion.  Stay tuned for further updates on both pieces of legislation. We’ll be following them!


California Taxes are like the World Cup

As the soccer World Cup began this week, attracting the attention of the United States (and of course, the rest of the world), I reflected on my own childhood – watching soccer with my family. Not just any soccer, but German “Bundesliga” soccer. We cheered for FC Kaiserslautern and I also grew up following the German National Team in their quest for World Cups (3 so far). Of course, now that the United States team is also a contender, I watched with pride as both Germany and the US won their opening matches. I thought...World Cup soccer and CA tax policies have some commonalities. That might make an interesting blog.

 Upsets occur...Some winners, some losers

An upset can certainly happen in soccer. Sometimes in the blink of an eye – there’s  a lucky bounce or well directed header; sometimes a bad call by the referee, or sometimes just a crazy upset when you least expect it. On the World Cup stage, players are representing their whole country and there is a great deal of passion in both a win and a loss.

In California tax policy, we too have winners and losers, and passion on various sides of an issue. If you follow this blog, you know that our clients (and clients across the state) were dealt a huge blow last year when the Governor and state legislature decided to end the 20+ year enterprise zone program – literally in a vote that happened overnight. Almost a year later, people still ask me every day – “Why did they do away with a program that helped companies that were hiring people?” The answer, of course, is complicated – like that call in soccer as to whether the referee should pull out that red card on the player or not!

In place of the enterprise zone benefits, some new benefits have taken shape. There is the California Competes Tax Credit and the California Manufacturers’ Exemption for sales tax. The California Competes Tax Credit is for companies entering or expanding within California. A certain amount of money is allocated annually. There are myriad selection criteria and companies will have to prove their worthiness to even be considered. There will be winners…and losers. (Click here for more) The California Manufacturers’ Exemption for sales tax is an exemption for a portion of the state sales tax for companies in specific NAICS codes, placing into service qualifying machinery and equipment. It sounds straightforward, but there are nuances that will play out better for some companies than others. Not all industries qualify (some losers) and not all assets for even a qualified industry qualify (more losers), and it sunsets in 2021 (hurry up if you want to be a winner!). However, overall, we trust that it will be a good program that helps to put California on par with other states that have similar exemptions (a winner). (Click here for more)Read more